C

When selecting a desk lamp for daily study and work that is energy-efficient, the correct approach is to focus on the type of bulb and power consumption, prioritizing products with high energy efficiency, such as LED bulbs, to reduce long-term usage costs and energy consumption. The incorrect approach is to ignore energy efficiency and choose high-power, low-efficiency bulbs, which will result in unnecessary electricity costs and energy waste.

Option A: Using a desk lamp with a standard incandescent bulb and a power rating of 60 watts, which consumes a significant amount of electricity. Incandescent bulbs generate light by heating a filament with electricity, with most of the electrical energy converted into heat and only a small portion into light, resulting in extremely low luminous efficiency. A 60-watt power rating will consume a large amount of electricity during prolonged use, leading to high electricity bills. For example, if used for 5 hours daily, the monthly electricity consumption for this single lamp would be substantial. Additionally, it generates significant heat, posing potential safety hazards and failing to meet energy-saving requirements.

Option B: A desk lamp equipped with a 40-watt halogen bulb, which has lower energy efficiency. While halogen bulbs offer improved lifespan and brightness compared to incandescent bulbs, they still operate by heating a filament to emit light, resulting in low energy efficiency. A 40-watt power rating will also consume a significant amount of electricity over extended use. Additionally, halogen bulbs generate high temperatures during use, increasing safety risks and causing energy waste, and are ineffective in reducing electricity costs.

Option C: A 10-watt LED bulb, which is highly energy-efficient and emits light efficiently. LED bulbs emit light through semiconductors, converting nearly all electrical energy into light, resulting in extremely high luminous efficiency. A 10-watt LED bulb can achieve or even exceed the lighting performance of traditional high-power bulbs. Calculated at 5 hours of daily use, its power consumption is only a fraction of that of incandescent or halogen bulbs. Over the long term, this significantly reduces electricity costs. Additionally, LED bulbs have a long lifespan, reducing replacement frequency and lowering overall usage costs from multiple angles, making them an ideal choice for energy conservation and electricity savings.

Option D: Installing a 25-watt fluorescent light bulb requires preheating and has higher energy consumption. Although fluorescent bulbs are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, they still fall short compared to LED bulbs. They require preheating before use, and some energy is consumed during the preheating process. Additionally, fluorescent bulbs contain harmful substances such as mercury, and improper disposal can pollute the environment. The 25-watt power consumption is significant over the long term and cannot meet the core requirements of high energy efficiency and cost savings.

C

When selecting a table lamp for a study from an energy efficiency perspective, the correct approach is to prioritize products with high luminous efficacy and low energy consumption. This ensures adequate lighting while minimizing energy consumption and operational costs. The incorrect approach is to choose lamps with high energy consumption and low efficiency, as these not only waste energy but also increase long-term economic burdens.

Option A: A table lamp equipped with a traditional 60-watt incandescent bulb, which is low in brightness and high in energy consumption. The light-emitting principle of incandescent bulbs determines their extremely low energy utilization rate, with most of the 60-watt power converted into useless heat energy, and a light-emitting efficiency of only around 10%. Prolonged use in a study consumes a large amount of electricity and results in high electricity bills. Additionally, the low brightness may fail to meet the lighting requirements for tasks such as reading or writing, necessitating frequent adjustments to increase brightness or adding more lamps, further exacerbating energy consumption.

Option B: Using a 20-watt compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) table lamp with flickering issues. While compact fluorescent lamps are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, some products exhibit flickering, which can cause eye strain when used for extended periods. Additionally, fluorescent lamps require time to warm up, making them inconvenient to use. They contain mercury, and improper disposal can pollute the environment. From the perspective of long-term use and overall energy efficiency, they are not the optimal choice.

Option C: table lamps equipped with 12-watt LED bulbs, which offer stable lighting and energy efficiency. LED bulbs have advantages such as high luminous efficiency, low energy consumption, and a long lifespan. A 12-watt LED bulb provides sufficient and stable lighting to meet the various needs of a study. Its energy consumption is approximately one-fifth that of an incandescent bulb of the same brightness, significantly reducing electricity consumption. Additionally, LED bulbs have no flickering, emit soft light, and effectively protect vision, offering clear advantages in both energy efficiency and user experience.

Option D: Install a 35-watt halogen bulb in a table lamp that generates significant heat. While halogen bulbs offer higher brightness, they generate excessive heat, indicating that a large amount of electrical energy is converted into heat, resulting in significant energy waste. A 35-watt power rating leads to higher electricity costs during prolonged use. Additionally, excessive heat poses safety hazards such as fire risks and accelerates the aging of internal components, shortening the lamp's lifespan, which contradicts the principle of prioritizing energy efficiency in selection.

C

When selecting a table lamp for a bedroom, from an energy consumption perspective, the correct approach is to choose a product with low energy consumption and high luminous efficiency, which can ensure nighttime lighting effects while saving electricity costs. The incorrect approach is to choose a table lamp with high energy consumption and low efficiency, which will lead to unnecessary energy consumption and increased electricity bills.

Option A: A table lamp using a 40-watt incandescent bulb, which is dim and energy-consuming. Incandescent bulbs have inherently low luminous efficiency. At 40 watts, they provide insufficient light for reading or getting up at night while consuming a significant amount of electricity. Bedroom table lamps are typically left on for extended periods at night, and using incandescent bulbs can cause electricity bills to rise rapidly. Additionally, the heat generated by incandescent bulbs may affect nearby items, posing safety hazards.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 22-watt fluorescent bulb, which has slow startup and higher energy consumption. Fluorescent bulbs require a certain amount of time to warm up before emitting light, making them inconvenient for urgent lighting needs such as getting up at night. Although it is more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, its energy consumption is still higher than LED bulbs. Over time, this will result in higher electricity bills. Additionally, the light quality of fluorescent bulbs may be unstable, affecting the user experience.

Option C: A table lamp equipped with an 8-watt LED bulb, which provides soft light and is energy-efficient. An 8-watt LED bulb is sufficient for nighttime reading and lighting in a bedroom, and its soft light does not strain the eyes, creating a comfortable environment for sleep and reading. The low energy consumption of LED bulbs means they do not consume excessive electricity even when left on for extended periods, resulting in significant savings on electricity bills compared to traditional bulbs. Additionally, its long lifespan reduces the need for frequent replacements, further lowering usage costs.

Option D: Equipped with a 30-watt halogen bulb, this table lamp experiences noticeable light decay over time. Halogen bulbs exhibit significant light decay during use, with illumination quality gradually deteriorating as usage increases. To maintain adequate lighting, higher-wattage bulbs may need to be replaced, thereby increasing energy consumption. The 30-watt power rating itself consumes a significant amount of electricity when used for extended periods at night, it will consume a significant amount of electricity. From the perspective of long-term energy consumption and performance, it is not an ideal choice for a bedroom table lamp.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient and cost-effective table lamp for a children's room, the correct approach is to prioritize the energy efficiency and lifespan of the bulb, opting for high-efficiency products like LED bulbs to reduce electricity bills and replacement costs. The incorrect approach is to choose bulbs with high energy consumption, short lifespans, and potential safety hazards, as this increases usage costs and safety risks.

Option A: A table lamp equipped with a 50-watt incandescent bulb, which generates a lot of heat and consumes a lot of electricity. The high power and low luminous efficiency of incandescent bulbs result in significant energy consumption when used in children's rooms. Children spend a lot of time studying and playing in their rooms, and leaving such a table lamp on for extended periods can lead to high electricity bills. Additionally, the excessive heat generated not only wastes energy but also poses risks of burns to children or fires, making it an unsuitable choice for children's room table lamps.

Option B: A table lamp using a 28-watt fluorescent bulb, which contains harmful substances. Fluorescent bulbs contain mercury and other harmful substances. If broken, mercury leakage can contaminate the children's room environment and harm children's health. Although they consume less energy than incandescent bulbs, they still fall short of LED bulbs in terms of energy efficiency. Over time, electricity costs can remain high. Additionally, the quality of light emitted by fluorescent bulbs may affect children's vision, making them unsuitable for children's room table lamps.

Option C: A table lamp using a 9-watt LED bulb, which is safe, energy-efficient, and has a long lifespan. LED bulbs have no flickering and emit soft light, effectively protecting children's vision. A 9-watt power rating is sufficient to meet the lighting needs of a children's room, offering significant energy savings compared to traditional bulbs and significantly reducing electricity costs. Its ultra-long lifespan reduces replacement frequency and maintenance costs. Additionally, LED bulbs contain no harmful substances, making them safe and environmentally friendly, ideal for use in children's rooms.

Option D: Installs a 32-watt halogen bulb, a table lamp with glaring light. Halogen bulbs emit glaring light, and prolonged exposure to such light can harm children's vision. The 32-watt power consumption results in high energy usage, leading to increased electricity costs when used for extended periods in a children's room. Furthermore, halogen bulbs generate significant heat, posing a safety hazard and making them unsuitable for use as lighting fixtures in children's rooms.

C

When selecting table lamps for an office from an energy-saving and environmentally friendly perspective, the correct approach is to choose products with high energy efficiency and good environmental performance to reduce office electricity costs and minimize energy waste. The incorrect approach is to choose table lamps with high energy consumption and low efficiency, as this not only increases operational costs but also contradicts the principles of green office practices.

Option A: Using a 75-watt incandescent bulb, which is energy-intensive and has unstable brightness. The high power of a 75-watt incandescent bulb means that prolonged use in an office setting will consume a significant amount of electricity, increasing office electricity costs. Its unstable brightness can also affect work efficiency, such as when handling documents or drawing, where fluctuating light levels can cause visual fatigue. Additionally, the low luminous efficiency of incandescent bulbs results in significant energy waste.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 30-watt fluorescent bulb, which has light decay issues. While fluorescent bulbs are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs to some extent, the light decay problem worsens over time, leading to a gradual decline in lighting quality. To maintain adequate lighting, bulbs may need to be replaced prematurely, increasing maintenance costs. Additionally, their energy consumption remains higher than that of LED bulbs, making it difficult to achieve energy-saving and environmentally friendly goals in the long term.

Option C: A table lamp equipped with a 15-watt LED bulb, which is highly energy-efficient and flicker-free. The 15-watt LED bulb provides stable and adequate lighting to meet various office lighting needs. Its energy-efficient characteristics can save a significant amount of electricity compared to traditional bulbs, reducing office electricity costs. The flicker-free light effectively reduces visual fatigue among office staff, improving work efficiency. Additionally, LED bulbs do not contain harmful substances such as mercury, making them environmentally friendly when disposed of, in line with green office requirements.

Option D: Install a 40-watt halogen bulb table lamp with low energy conversion efficiency. Halogen bulbs have low energy conversion efficiency, with a large amount of electricity converted into heat and only a small portion converted into light. A 40-watt power rating for prolonged use in an office will consume a significant amount of electricity, increasing operational costs. Moreover, the high heat generated may affect the normal operation of office equipment, posing safety hazards and failing to meet the energy-saving and environmentally friendly selection criteria for office table lamps.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient and durable table lamp for a study, the correct approach is to choose a product with high energy efficiency and a long lifespan. This will help save on electricity bills and reduce the frequency and cost of replacing bulbs. The incorrect approach is to choose a lamp with high energy consumption and a short lifespan, which will increase usage costs and inconvenience.

Option A: Uses a 60-watt incandescent bulb, which is prone to damage and energy-intensive. Incandescent bulbs not only have high energy consumption but also a short lifespan. When used for extended periods in a study, they are prone to damage due to issues like the filament burning out, requiring frequent replacements. Each bulb replacement increases both usage costs and time costs. Additionally, the 60-watt power consumption when left on for extended periods consumes a significant amount of electricity, resulting in high electricity bills, which does not meet the requirements for energy efficiency and durability.

Option B: Using a 25-watt fluorescent light bulb, which requires frequent replacement. While fluorescent bulbs are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, they have a limited lifespan. In a study where the lamp is used frequently, they need to be replaced often. Frequent replacements not only increase the cost of purchasing bulbs but may also damage the lamp due to improper handling during replacement. Additionally, their energy consumption remains higher than LED bulbs, and long-term use fails to achieve the desired energy-saving effect.

Option C: A table lamp equipped with a 12-watt LED bulb, which is energy-efficient and has a lifespan of 50,000 hours. The 12-watt LED bulb has high luminous efficiency, significantly reducing energy consumption compared to traditional bulbs and lowering electricity costs in the study. Its 50,000-hour lifespan significantly reduces the frequency of bulb replacements, eliminating the need for bulb changes throughout the lamp's entire lifespan, saving both money and hassle. Additionally, LED bulbs offer stable performance, providing consistent lighting for the study.

Option D: A table lamp equipped with a 38-watt halogen bulb, which has rapid light output decay. Halogen bulbs experience rapid light output decay, and as usage increases, the lighting quality will deteriorate significantly. To maintain lighting quality, it may be necessary to replace the bulb with a higher-wattage bulb prematurely, further increasing energy consumption and costs. The 38-watt power rating itself consumes a significant amount of electricity when used for extended periods in a study, making it an unsuitable choice for a study table lamp from both energy-saving and durability perspectives.

C

When selecting a table lamp for the living room from an energy-saving and low-carbon perspective, the correct approach is to choose products with low energy consumption, good environmental performance, and high energy efficiency to reduce overall household electricity costs, lower carbon emissions, and practice a green lifestyle. The incorrect approach is to choose high-energy-consuming table lamps with light bulbs that pose environmental pollution risks or cause severe energy waste. This not only increases household expenses but also contradicts the goals of low-carbon and environmental protection.

Option A: Using an 80-watt incandescent bulb, which is energy-intensive and generates significant heat. Incandescent bulbs rely on electric current to heat a filament and emit light, with extremely low luminous efficiency. During use, most of the 80-watt power is converted into heat, with only a small portion converted into light, resulting in substantial energy waste. In a living room where the lamp may be left on for extended periods during leisure activities, high energy consumption translates to higher electricity bills. Additionally, the excessive heat generated not only raises the surrounding temperature but may also affect nearby furniture and decorations, posing potential safety risks and failing to meet energy-saving and low-carbon requirements.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 35-watt fluorescent bulb, which poses a mercury contamination risk. While fluorescent bulbs are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, they contain mercury. If the bulb breaks, mercury leakage can cause severe environmental pollution, and improper handling may also harm human health. Additionally, the 35-watt power consumption remains relatively high during prolonged use. From a lifecycle perspective, both energy consumption and environmental risks fail to meet the energy-saving and low-carbon requirements for selecting a living room table lamp.

Option C: An 18-watt LED bulb lamp that is energy-efficient, environmentally friendly, and flicker-free. LED bulbs emit light through semiconductors, achieving extremely high energy conversion efficiency. An 18-watt LED bulb provides sufficient brightness for everyday living room lighting needs, saving a significant amount of electricity compared to traditional bulbs and effectively reducing household electricity costs. Additionally, LED bulbs do not contain harmful substances such as mercury, making them more environmentally friendly throughout their production, use, and disposal processes, aligning with low-carbon living principles. Furthermore, the flicker-free feature provides a more comfortable lighting environment for family members, making it an ideal choice for energy-saving and low-carbon living.

Option D: Install a 45-watt halogen bulb, a table lamp with low luminous efficacy and noticeable heat generation. Although halogen bulbs have higher brightness, they have low luminous efficacy, with a significant amount of electrical energy converted into heat, resulting in noticeable heat generation and energy waste. A 45-watt power rating in a living room when left on for extended periods will consume a considerable amount of electricity, increasing the household's electricity bill. Additionally, the high heat generated poses safety hazards and requires additional cooling measures, further increasing energy consumption and failing to meet the energy-saving and low-carbon standards for living room table lamps.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient and cost-effective table lamp for a study desk, the correct approach is to choose a product with high energy efficiency, reasonable pricing, and a long service life. This ensures adequate lighting for extended study sessions while minimizing long-term usage costs. An incorrect approach would be to focus solely on price while ignoring energy consumption and performance, or to select high-energy-consuming products, which ultimately lead to increased usage costs.

Option A: A table lamp using a 55-watt incandescent bulb, which is dim and energy-intensive. Incandescent bulbs have low luminous efficiency, and a 55-watt power rating during study sessions not only fails to provide adequate brightness but also consumes a significant amount of electricity. Using a table lamp with incandescent bulbs for extended periods will significantly increase monthly electricity bills. Additionally, their low brightness may impair learning effectiveness and cause eye strain, making them an unsuitable choice from both economic and practical perspectives.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 32-watt fluorescent bulb, which has slow startup times and a short lifespan. Fluorescent bulbs require a certain amount of time to warm up before reaching full brightness, making them inconvenient for use in situations where immediate lighting is needed. Additionally, its lifespan is relatively short, and frequent bulb replacements not only increase purchase costs but also cause inconvenience. Furthermore, the 32-watt power consumption, even when used long-term, still consumes more electricity compared to energy-efficient bulbs, failing to achieve both cost-effectiveness and energy savings.

Option C: 10-watt LED bulbs, energy-efficient and affordably priced table lamps. 10-watt LED bulbs have high luminous efficiency, providing stable and bright light to meet the need for clear illumination during study. Their energy consumption is only a fraction of that of traditional incandescent bulbs, resulting in significant electricity savings over time. Additionally, as technology advances, LED bulbs have become more affordable, offering high cost-effectiveness. They ensure adequate lighting while reducing usage costs, making them an excellent choice for both economy and energy efficiency.

Option D: Install a 42-watt halogen bulb table lamp, which emits harsh light and has high energy consumption. Halogen bulbs emit harsh light, and prolonged exposure to such light can harm the eyes and impair vision health. The high power of 42 watts results in significant energy consumption, leading to higher electricity bills when used for extended periods during daily study sessions. Additionally, halogen bulbs generate significant heat, posing safety hazards, and may incur increased maintenance costs in the future due to heat dissipation issues, failing to meet the criteria for energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient table lamp for a bedroom, the correct approach is to choose a product with low energy consumption, appropriate lighting, and high energy efficiency to reduce nighttime electricity consumption while providing a comfortable lighting experience. The incorrect approach is to choose a lamp with high energy consumption, poor light quality, or other issues, as this not only increases electricity costs but may also affect sleep and rest quality.

Option A: A table lamp using a 45-watt incandescent bulb, which emits dim light and consumes a lot of energy. Incandescent bulbs have low luminous efficiency, and a 45-watt power rating is insufficient for adequate reading or nighttime lighting in a bedroom. Additionally, in an environment where the lamp may be left on for extended periods, high energy consumption leads to higher electricity bills. The heat generated may also affect the comfort of the sleeping environment and even pose a fire hazard, failing to meet energy-saving and consumption-reduction requirements.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 28-watt fluorescent bulb, which may cause electromagnetic interference. Fluorescent bulbs may emit electromagnetic interference while in use, affecting the normal operation of nearby electronic devices such as bedside alarms or mobile phones. Additionally, their energy consumption is higher than that of LED bulbs, making them ineffective for achieving energy-saving goals over the long term. Furthermore, the light quality of fluorescent bulbs may be unstable, affecting the experience of nighttime reading and rest.

Option C: A table lamp equipped with an 8-watt LED bulb, which is energy-efficient, power-saving, and emits soft light. The 8-watt LED bulb has extremely low energy consumption yet provides sufficient light for nighttime reading and lighting near the bed in a bedroom. Its soft, non-glaring light creates a warm and comfortable atmosphere for sleeping and reading, helping to relax the mind and body. The energy-saving characteristics of LED bulbs mean that they do not consume excessive amounts of electricity even when left on for extended periods, significantly reducing electricity costs in the bedroom compared to traditional bulbs, making them an ideal choice for energy-saving bedside table lamps.

Option D: Install a 35-watt halogen bulb, a table lamp with severe light decay. Halogen bulbs experience significant light decay over time, resulting in a noticeable decline in lighting quality as usage increases. To maintain lighting quality, bulbs may need to be replaced prematurely, increasing usage costs. The 35-watt power consumption is also high for prolonged use at night, failing to meet energy-saving requirements. Additionally, halogen bulbs generate significant heat, posing potential safety risks in the confined space of a bedside area.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient and cost-effective decorative table lamp for a study, the correct approach is to find a product that strikes a good balance between energy efficiency, price, decorative appeal, and lifespan. The incorrect approach is to overly emphasize a single aspect, such as prioritizing decorative appeal while neglecting energy efficiency and cost, or focusing solely on price while ignoring overall performance.

Option A: A table lamp using a 65-watt incandescent bulb, which is highly decorative but extremely energy-inefficient. While this lamp may have an attractive design and add a unique decorative touch to the study, the incandescent bulb it uses is highly energy-consuming and has extremely low luminous efficiency. In a study where the lamp may be used for extended periods, high energy consumption can lead to significantly increased electricity bills. Over the long term, the high operating costs make it uneconomical, even if it is highly decorative, and it fails to meet the criteria for energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 30-watt fluorescent bulb, which has an attractive design but a short lifespan. While the fluorescent bulb lamp meets the decorative needs of a study, its short lifespan requires frequent bulb replacements, which not only increases the cost of purchasing bulbs but also adds the hassle of replacement. Additionally, the 30-watt power consumption is not low over extended use, and overall, it fails to achieve the desired balance between energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Option C: A 12-watt LED bulb table lamp with an elegant design and energy-saving benefits. The 12-watt LED bulb provides ample lighting while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to traditional bulbs, effectively lowering electricity bills and long-term usage costs. Its elegant design meets the decorative needs of a study, enhancing its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, LED bulbs have a longer lifespan, reducing replacement frequency and further improving cost-effectiveness. This table lamp excels in both energy efficiency and decorative appeal, making it an excellent choice for maximizing value for money.

Option D: Install a 40-watt halogen bulb, a table lamp with a unique design but higher energy consumption. The unique design gives the table lamp strong decorative appeal, adding a distinctive style to the study. However, the 40-watt halogen bulb has higher energy consumption, leading to significant electricity costs during prolonged use. Additionally, halogen bulbs have issues such as low light efficiency and significant heat generation, which may result in additional maintenance costs in the long run. From the perspectives of energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness, they are not an appropriate choice for a study table lamp.

C

When selecting an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly table lamp for children, the correct approach is to choose products that are safe for children's health, energy-efficient, and environmentally friendly. The incorrect approach is to choose table lamps with light bulbs that pose safety hazards, are energy-intensive, or are not environmentally friendly, as these may have adverse effects on children's health and the environment.

Option A: Uses a 50-watt incandescent bulb, which has unstable light and high energy consumption, Incandescent bulbs not only consume a lot of energy but also have poor light stability, often flickering or dimming, which can harm children's vision when used for extended periods. The high power of 50 watts results in significant energy consumption and high electricity bills when used daily for extended study sessions. Additionally, incandescent bulbs are difficult to decompose after disposal, making them environmentally unfriendly and failing to meet the criteria for energy efficiency and environmental friendliness.

Option B: A table lamp equipped with a 25-watt fluorescent bulb, which contains harmful substances and has average energy efficiency. Fluorescent bulbs contain harmful substances such as mercury. If broken, mercury leakage can pollute the environment and pose potential health risks to children. Additionally, their energy efficiency is relatively average compared to LED bulbs, resulting in higher energy consumption over time and failing to achieve energy-saving goals. From an environmental and energy-saving perspective, neither option is an ideal choice for a children's study table lamp.

Option C: A table lamp using a 9-watt LED bulb, which is flicker-free, energy-efficient, and mercury-free. The flicker-free characteristic of LED bulbs effectively protects children's vision by preventing visual fatigue caused by flickering light. With a power consumption of only 9 watts, it significantly reduces energy consumption compared to traditional bulbs, lowering household electricity costs. Additionally, LED bulbs do not contain harmful substances such as mercury, and they do not pollute the environment during production, use, or disposal, truly achieving both energy efficiency and environmental protection. This makes them an excellent choice for children's study lamps.

Option D: Installing a 38-watt halogen bulb, which generates excessive heat and has low light efficiency. Halogen bulbs produce significant heat, and children may accidentally touch them during study, posing a safety hazard. Their low light efficiency results in a large amount of electrical energy being converted into heat rather than light, causing energy waste. The 38-watt power consumption will lead to higher electricity usage over extended periods. Additionally, improper disposal of halogen bulbs can harm the environment, failing to meet the criteria for selecting an energy-efficient and eco-friendly table lamp for children.